On October 6, 2026 Canada filed three will-say statements regarding the Jordan’s Principle process pursuant to 2025 CHRT 6, following the Tribunal's August 21, 2026 directions. 

On September 21, 2026, the Federal Court provided directions with respect to the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations’ motion for leave to intervene in Canada's Judicial Review of 2025 CHRT 80.

Throughout the month of September 2026, parties to the case filed their positions on the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations Notion of Motion for leave to intervene in Canada's Judicial Review of 2025 CHRT 80. 

On September 22, 2026, Canada submitted its response to the Tribunal, requesting that the 39 orders sought in the Joint Motion be dismissed on the basis that they exceed the Tribunal’s remedial role, duplicate existing processes, and could impede ongoing improvements to Jordan’s Principle service delivery and backlog reduction.

On August 8, 2026, Canada's submitted to the Tribunal it's response to the other Parties proposed procedure for addressing outstanding issues under 2025 CHRT 6. 

In August 2025, the Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy published its final report for its considerations of Jordan's Principle. 

On July 3, 2026, the Caring Society filed questions and written submissions with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal regarding implementation of 2025 CHRT 6 and the unresolved outstandings matters related to Jordan's Principle. 

This document sets out the main myths being advanced about Canada’s proposed plan to permanently end its discriminatory conduct in First Nations Child and Family Services (often called long term reform) and explains what those claims mean in practical terms for First Nations.