On November 3, 2026, the Chairperson of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal issued decision 2026 CHRT 123, the full reasoning for its August 18, 2026, ruling letter dismissing Canada's panel recomposition request in the case regarding First Nations child welfare and Jordan's Principle.

On October 9, 2026, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) filed its Respondents' Record to the Tribunal regarding Canada's September 19, 2025, judicial review of 2025 CHRT 80. 

On September 29, the Caring Society, Assembly of First Nations, Chiefs of Ontario, and Nishnawbe Aski Nation

filed a Joint Reply regarding Jordan's Principle compliance and implementation of 2026 CHRT 6 pursuant to the Tribunal's August 21, 2026, direction. This followed the Joint Notice of Motion that the Parties filed on September 9 and Canada's reply filed on September 22. 

The Caring Society filed the will-say statements of Brittany Mathews, Dr. Ryan Giroux, Katlyn O'Shea, Kim-Marie Rumley and Ursula Larsson.

On September 21, 2026, the Federal Court provided directions with respect to the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations’ motion for leave to intervene in Canada's Judicial Review of 2025 CHRT 80.

Throughout the month of September 2026, parties to the case filed their positions on the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations Notion of Motion for leave to intervene in Canada's Judicial Review of 2025 CHRT 80. 

On September 1, 2026, the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations filed a Notion of Motion for leave to intervene in the judicial review filed by Canada on 2025 CHRT 80.

On September 9, 2026, Canada filed its record in the judicial review of 2025 CHRT 80. 

On September 9, 2026, the Caring Society filed a motion asking the Federal Court to strike or stay Canada’s judicial review application, arguing that the challenge is premature because the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal proceedings remain ongoing and no final decision has yet been made.